Return to List of Cultural Revolution Reviews

 

Michael Schoenhals, Ed.  China’s Cultural Revolution, 1966-1969: Not a Dinner Party.  Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe, 1996.

 

Michael Schoenhals’s documentary history of the first years of the Cultural Revolution is a success on two fronts.  First, it serves as an invaluable text for introducing China’s extraordinary years of upheaval to undergraduate students; and second, through its vast collection of translated primary documents, the volume sheds new light on a complex and troubled time. 

 

Schoenhals divides the book into three parts, all of which consist of short primary documents accompanied by brief commentaries and explanatory footnotes.  Part One, “Intentions and Consequences,” includes 1966 pronouncements by Mao Zedong, Lin Biao, and Zhou Enlai, along with 15 other dry official proclamations and articles.  The documents illustrate an initial plunge into “extensive democracy” and “bombarding the headquarters” in 1966 and 1967, then a pullback as the center attempted to rein in “excessive democracy” (see Document 9, banning nationwide organizations, and Document 11, proscribing “ethnic mass organizations,” for example), and finally damage control in 1969 as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) commenced rebuilding both itself and a polity wracked by social disorder. 

 

The main strength of the volume lies in Part Two, “Effects and Consequences,” which includes sections on party purges, rebellion, culture, the economy, and Sino-foreign (mis)perceptions.   From protest letters urging restraint and questioning the top leadership (Documents 27 and 29, both of which landed their authors in prison), to Guangzhou barbers pledging to “Vigorously and Speedily Eradicate Bizarre Bourgeois Hair Styles” (Document 43), Part Two shows a colorful, tragic, and human side of the first years of the Cultural Revolution.  Perhaps most noteworthy is a gripping transcript of Red Guards interrogating Wang Guangmei (Liu Shaoqi’s wife), which strongly supports Schoenhals’s reminder that “the vicious attack, humiliating denunciation, and physical abuse” of Party members was as important to the unfolding of the Cultural Revolution as was the “persecution of ordinary citizens” (p. 93).

 

Part Three, “After the Event,” combines official, post-1976 verdicts on the Cultural Revolution with individual reminiscences and displays the editor’s sensitivity toward differing historical interpretations.  Yet the sudden jump from 1966-69 to post-1976 documents reveals the book’s main flaw – it all but completely ignores the years from 1970 to 1976.  Unfortunately, Schoenhals’s silence on the 1970s perpetuates an already existing bias in the historical field toward the exciting, tumultuous, and relatively document-rich early phase of the Cultural Revolution.  However, the 1970-1976 period was twice as long, and certainly just as influential on the development of Chinese society, as the earlier stage.  Although Schoenhals acknowledges that many characteristics of the Cultural Revolution continued past 1969, his complete inattention to the Lin Biao affair, the Gang of Four, rapprochement with the United States, or anything else during the seven long years between 1969 and Mao’s death, is disappointing. 

 

In addition, while most of the rich and excellently translated primary documents stand alone, oftentimes Schoenhals’s commentary is too cursory, or even worse, dismissive.  For example, while undergraduate readers will surely be moved by the gut-wrenching depiction of Vice-Premier Bo Yibo’s torture and incarceration, the lack of background information provided on Bo’s status, expertise, and political background make the story seem like just another struggle session against some old man.  In another oversight, Kuai Dafu, the author of Document 25, is described by Schoenhals as simply “a twenty-one-year-old student” in Qinghua University’s Chemistry Department, with no mention of Kuai’s central leadership role in the Red Guard movement and his back-and-forth dialogue with Chairman Mao. 

 

In spite of this shortcoming and an ill-advised, sweeping dismissal of a document praising cultural revolutionary model operas as “predictable, uninspired, unconvincing, and ugly” (p. 186), China’s Cultural Revolution is still an important teaching resource and a valuable contribution to Cultural Revolution studies.  No other English-language work provides such a wide-ranging, comprehensive, and engrossing collection of primary sources on the period.  In a review, John Gittings wrote that the book “peers into odd corners as well as plotting the main highways and should amply fulfill its purpose” (China Quarterly 152, Dec. 1997, pp. 883-885).

 

Jeremy Brown

 

© Copyright 2003.  All Rights Reserved.